Developing pathways, a hope‐enhancing intervention for metastatic lung cancer patients receiving cancer treatment

Objective Between 40% and 65% of lung cancer patients report concern about maintaining valued activities and roles, yet few interventions address this concern. Hope, a patient's perceived ability to generate goals and identify ways to pursue them, may be a promising intervention target to suppo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2021-06, Vol.30 (6), p.863-873
Hauptverfasser: McLouth, Laurie E., Weyman, Kaitlyn, Golden, Shannon L., Cheavens, Jennifer S., Peterman, Amy, Bursac, Vilma, Gabbard, Jennifer, Weaver, Kathryn E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Between 40% and 65% of lung cancer patients report concern about maintaining valued activities and roles, yet few interventions address this concern. Hope, a patient's perceived ability to generate goals and identify ways to pursue them, may be a promising intervention target to support function among lung cancer patients. The goal of this study was to assess metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) patient interest and preferences for a hope‐enhancing intervention. Methods We conducted a sequential mixed‐methods (survey followed by semi‐structured interviews) study with patients with mNSCLC. Surveys assessed patient interest in, perceived helpfulness of, and preferences for a hope intervention. A subset of 12 patients (and caregivers, when present) completed semi‐structured interviews to elicit feedback on proposed intervention content and procedures. Results Survey data from 60 patients (40% male; Mean age = 62.5; SD = 9.3) suggested high perceived importance of pursuing personal goals during cancer treatment, moderate perceived helpfulness in discussing personal goals, and preference for a nurse‐led intervention. Based on these data, a 5‐session, nurse‐led intervention protocol was drafted and reviewed with 12 patients. Interviewed patients and caregivers agreed working towards goals was beneficial, liked the intervention concept, and thought prompts and rating scales on handouts would facilitate discussion. The majority preferred nurse delivery during infusions. Conclusions A nurse‐led hope‐enhancing intervention delivered primarily during infusions may be acceptable to mNSCLC patients. Future work should test feasibility and identify ways to incorporate caregivers and oncology providers into hope interventions.
ISSN:1057-9249
1099-1611
DOI:10.1002/pon.5650