Brain‐gut psychotherapies: Promising tools to address gastrointestinal problems in patients with eating disorders

Gastrointestinal (GI) problems are common in individuals with eating disorders (EDs) and associated with distress, impairment, and increased healthcare utilization. GI symptoms may be exacerbated by meals and other interventions central to ED recovery thereby contributing to negative clinical outcom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of eating disorders 2021-06, Vol.54 (6), p.1063-1067
Hauptverfasser: Wildes, Jennifer E., Bedell, Alyse, Graham, Andrea K., Kells, Meredith
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Gastrointestinal (GI) problems are common in individuals with eating disorders (EDs) and associated with distress, impairment, and increased healthcare utilization. GI symptoms may be exacerbated by meals and other interventions central to ED recovery thereby contributing to negative clinical outcomes. Informed by models emphasizing the role of the brain‐gut axis in the expression of GI symptoms, this article describes a program of research to adapt “brain‐gut psychotherapies” for EDs. First, the role of the brain‐gut axis in GI symptoms is described, and evidence‐based brain‐gut psychotherapies are reviewed, with an emphasis on cognitive behavioral therapy for GI disorders and gut‐directed hypnotherapy. Next, future directions for research in EDs to (a) understand the impact of GI symptoms on illness course and outcome; (b) clarify target engagement; (c) evaluate brain‐gut psychotherapies; and (d) optimize intervention reach and delivery are described. We present a conceptual model that emphasizes GI‐specific anxiety and altered gut physiology as targets of brain‐gut psychotherapies in EDs, and discuss several issues that need to be addressed in designing clinical trials to test these interventions. We also describe how engagement with multidisciplinary stakeholders and use of digital tools could speed translation from the laboratory to clinical settings.
ISSN:0276-3478
1098-108X
DOI:10.1002/eat.23555