Functional Outcome of Closed Reduction and Extension Casting in Forearm Fractures in Children

Introduction Fractures in children are extremely common scenarios encountered by orthopedicians. Conservative treatment has been the most preferred choice for the management of diaphyseal forearm fractures. Traditionally, pediatric forearm fractures are treated by above elbow plaster cast with the e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2022-02, Vol.14 (2), p.e22389-e22389
Hauptverfasser: Yadav, Parth, Phalak, Mukesh O, Patel, Shivam, Chaudhari, Tushar, Nair, Abhishek, Gurnani, Sagar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Fractures in children are extremely common scenarios encountered by orthopedicians. Conservative treatment has been the most preferred choice for the management of diaphyseal forearm fractures. Traditionally, pediatric forearm fractures are treated by above elbow plaster cast with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of children treated with closed reduction and extension casting for forearm fractures. Patient and methods This is a prospective study evaluating the functional and radiological outcomes of 30 children of less than the age of 14 years and without pathological fractures, treated with closed reduction and extension casting for forearm fractures, either both radius and ulna or radius or ulna at middle third level, who reported to the Department of Orthopedics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Center, Pune, India, between September 2019 and March 2022. Results The mean pre-operative angulation in radius (antero-posterior {AP}) was 22.7, radius (lateral {LAT}) was 24.2, ulna (AP) was 31.2, and ulna (LAT) was 29.2. The immediate post-operative angulation of radius (AP) was 0.7, radius (LAT) was 3.2, ulna (AP) was 0.6, and ulna (LAT) was 4.9. Cast status at two weeks, 83.3% had intact cast and 16.7% had loosened casts. Post removal, most patients had a good rotation of motion (ROM) at three and six weeks. Conclusion Casting with extended elbow is much better as compared to flexion casting in the hands of a trainee doctor. Furthermore, chances of loss of reduction are negligible in extension casting as compared to flexion casting.
ISSN:2168-8184
2168-8184
DOI:10.7759/cureus.22389