A Comparative Study of Epidural Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine Infusion versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

There has been considerable debate regarding the ideal anaesthetic technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is usually performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in prone position. The prone position under GA is associated with various complications. To address these complications, our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia Essays & Researches 2021-07, Vol.15 (3), p.306-311
Hauptverfasser: Turki, Sonali, Mir, Shafat Ahmad, Sofi, Khalid P, Khan, Nadeem, Khawaja, Rouf, Wani, Mohammad S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There has been considerable debate regarding the ideal anaesthetic technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is usually performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in prone position. The prone position under GA is associated with various complications. To address these complications, our study was carried out to determine whether epidural anaesthesia [EA] with dexmedetomidine sedation can be a better alternative to GA for PCNL. To compare the efficacy and feasibility of performing PCNL under EA in combination with dexmedetomidine infusion. Out of 225 patients observed in this study, 115 patients (group A) underwent PCNL under EA with dexmedetomidine infusion and 110 patients (group B) underwent PCNL under GA. Mean time to the first dose of rescue analgesia was significantly increased in Epidural group (328.17 ± 63.74) compared to GA group (72.09 min, p < .0001) and the mean Visual analog scale [VAS] scores were significantly lower in epidural compared to GA group at different time intervals during the first 24 h after surgery (p
ISSN:0259-1162
2229-7685
DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_124_21