Ten-year experience of an outpatient clinic for CKD-5 patients with multidisciplinary team and educational support

Purpose To analyze the results of an outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team and educational support for patients with late-stage CKD (lsCKD), to check its possible effect on their outcomes. Methods Longitudinal cohort study on patients followed up in the MaReA (Malattia Renale Avanzata = CK...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2022-04, Vol.54 (4), p.949-957
Hauptverfasser: Terlizzi, Vincenzo, Sandrini, Massimo, Vizzardi, Valerio, Tonoli, Mattia, Facchini, Annalisa, Manili, Luigi, Zeni, Letizia, Cancarini, Giovanni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze the results of an outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team and educational support for patients with late-stage CKD (lsCKD), to check its possible effect on their outcomes. Methods Longitudinal cohort study on patients followed up in the MaReA (Malattia Renale Avanzata = CKD5) outpatient clinic at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from 2005 to 2015 for at least six months. Trajectory of renal function over time has been evaluated only in those patients with at least four estimations of eGFR before referring to MaReA. Results Seven hundred and six patients were enrolled, their mean age was 72 ± 14 years, 59% were males. At the end of the study, 147 (21%) were still on MaReA, 240 (34%) on dialysis, 92 (13%) on very low-protein diet (VLPDs), 13 (2%) on pre-hemodialysis clinic, 23 (3%) improved renal function, 10 (1%) transplanted, 62 (9%) transferred/lost to follow-up, and 119 (17%) died. Optimal dialysis start (defined as start with definitive dialysis access, as an out-patient and without lsCKD complications) occurred in 180/240 (75%) patients. The results showed a slower eGFR decrease during MaReA follow-up compared to previous renal follow-up: − 2.0 vs. − 4.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 BSA/year ( p  
ISSN:0301-1623
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-021-02963-y