Efficient and precise Ultra-QuickDASH scale measuring lymphedema impact developed using computerized adaptive testing

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the Quick DASH for use in assessment of limb function in patients with upper extremity lymphedema using modern psychometric techniques. Method We conducted confirmative factor analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis to examin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2022-03, Vol.31 (3), p.917-925
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Cai, Schaverien, Mark V., Christensen, Joani M., Sidey-Gibbons, Chris J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aimed to evaluate and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the Quick DASH for use in assessment of limb function in patients with upper extremity lymphedema using modern psychometric techniques. Method We conducted confirmative factor analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis to examine the assumption of unidimensionality for IRT model on data from 285 patients who completed the Quick DASH, and then fit the data to Samejima’s graded response model (GRM) and assessed the assumption of local independence of items and calibrated the item responses for CAT simulation. Results Initial CFA and Mokken analyses demonstrated good scalability of items and unidimensionality. However, the local independence of items assumption was violated between items 9 (severity of pain) and 11 (sleeping difficulty due to pain) (Yen’s Q3 = 0.46) and disordered thresholds were evident for item 5 (cutting food). After addressing these breaches of assumptions, the re-analyzed GRM with the remaining 10 items achieved an improved fit. Simulation of CAT administration demonstrated a high correlation between scores on the CAT and the Quick Dash ( r  = 0.98). Items 2 (doing heavy chores) and 8 (limiting work or daily activities) were the most frequently used. The correlation among factor scores derived from the Quick DASH version with 11 items and the Ultra-Quick DASH version with items 2 and 8 was as high as 0.91. Conclusion By administering just these two best performing Quick Dash items we can obtain estimates that are very similar to those obtained from the full-length Quick Dash without the need for CAT technology.
ISSN:0962-9343
1573-2649
DOI:10.1007/s11136-021-02979-y