Motivation for Treatment Correlating Most Strongly with an Increase in Satisfaction with Type 2 Diabetes Treatment

Introduction We previously reported several factors that cross-sectionally correlate with treatment satisfaction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes visiting diabetes clinics. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with longitudinal changes in treatment satisfaction in patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes therapy 2022-04, Vol.13 (4), p.709-721
Hauptverfasser: Motoda, Saori, Watanabe, Nobuaki, Nakata, Shinsuke, Hayashi, Isao, Komatsu, Ryoya, Ishibashi, Chisaki, Fujita, Shingo, Baden, Megu Y., Kimura, Takekazu, Fujita, Yukari, Tokunaga, Ayumi, Takahara, Mitsuyoshi, Fukui, Kenji, Iwahashi, Hiromi, Kozawa, Junji, Shimomura, Iichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction We previously reported several factors that cross-sectionally correlate with treatment satisfaction in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes visiting diabetes clinics. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with longitudinal changes in treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods The study included 649 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral glucose-lowering agents who completed the first questionnaire in 2016. The collected data included scores from the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and other parameters regarding diabetes treatment. We analyzed 1-year longitudinal changes in DTSQ scores and investigated factors associated with these changes. Results Univariate linear regression analyses showed that changes in body weight, adherence to diet therapy, adherence to exercise therapy, cost burden, motivation for treatment, regularity of mealtimes, and perceived hypoglycemia correlated with changes in DTSQ scores. On the basis of multiple linear regression analyses, a decrease in hypoglycemia (β ± SE = − 0.394 ± 0.134, p  = 0.0034), cost burden (β ± SE = − 0.934 ± 0.389, p  = 0.017), and an increase in treatment motivation (β ± SE = 1.621 ± 0.606, p  = 0.0077) correlated with DTSQ score increases, suggesting that motivation for treatment had the strongest impact on score increases. Subgroup analyses revealed that an increase in motivation for treatment most significantly correlated with a DTSQ score increase in obese and poor glycemic control groups, regardless of age. Conclusion This is the first longitudinal study clarifying that an increase in motivation for treatment most strongly correlates with an increase in DTSQ score in patients with type 2 diabetes.
ISSN:1869-6953
1869-6961
DOI:10.1007/s13300-022-01235-x