A Census Tract–Level Examination of Differences in Social Determinants of Health Among People With HIV, by Race/Ethnicity and Geography, United States and Puerto Rico, 2017

Objective Social and structural factors, referred to as social determinants of health (SDH), create pathways or barriers to equitable sexual health, and information on these factors can provide critical insight into rates of diseases such as HIV. Our objectives were to describe and identify differen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Public health reports (1974) 2022-03, Vol.137 (2), p.278-290
Hauptverfasser:	Lyons, Shacara Johnson, Gant, Zanetta, Jin, Chan, Dailey, André, Nwangwu-Ike, Ndidi, Johnson, Anna Satcher
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Adults Census Census Tract Censuses Diagnosis Ecological studies Education Ethnicity Female Geography Health care industry Health insurance Hispanic Americans HIV HIV Infections - diagnosis HIV Infections - epidemiology Homeowners insurance Housing Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Income Insurance Male Men Minority & ethnic groups Occupational health Poverty Puerto Rico - epidemiology Race Residents Sexual health Sexually transmitted diseases Social Determinants of Health STD Unemployment Unemployment insurance United States - epidemiology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Objective Social and structural factors, referred to as social determinants of health (SDH), create pathways or barriers to equitable sexual health, and information on these factors can provide critical insight into rates of diseases such as HIV. Our objectives were to describe and identify differences, by race/ethnicity and geography, in SDH among adults with HIV. Methods We conducted an ecological study to explore SDH among people with HIV diagnosed in 2017, by race/ethnicity and geography, at the census-tract level in the United States and Puerto Rico. We defined the least favorable SDH as the following: low income (
ISSN:	0033-3549 1468-2877 1468-2877
DOI:	10.1177/0033354921990373