Antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual infective risk stratification in cardiac implantable electronic device: the PRACTICE study

Abstract Aims In patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) intervention, routine pre-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. A more powerful antibiotic protocol has been suggested in patients at high risk of infection. Stratification of individual infective risk could...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2022-03, Vol.24 (3), p.413-420
Hauptverfasser: Malagù, Michele, Vitali, Francesco, Brieda, Alessandro, Cimaglia, Paolo, De Raffele, Martina, Tazzari, Enea, Musolino, Cristina, Balla, Cristina, Serenelli, Matteo, Cultrera, Rosario, Rapezzi, Claudio, Bertini, Matteo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims In patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) intervention, routine pre-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. A more powerful antibiotic protocol has been suggested in patients at high risk of infection. Stratification of individual infective risk could guide the prophylaxis before CIED procedure. Methods and results Patients undergoing CIED surgery were stratified according to the Shariff score in low and high infective risk. Patients in the ‘low-risk’ group were treated with only two antibiotic administrations while patients in the ‘high-risk’ group were treated with a prolonged 9-day protocol, according to renal function and allergies. We followed-up patients for 250 days with clinical outpatient visit and electronic control of the CIED. As primary endpoint, we evaluated CIED-related infections. A total of 937 consecutive patients were enrolled, of whom 735 were stratified in the ‘low-risk’ group and 202 in the ‘high-risk’ group. Despite different risk profiles, CIED-related infection rate at 250 days was similar in the two groups (8/735 in ‘low risk’ vs. 4/202 in ‘high risk’, P = 0.32). At multivariate analysis, active neoplasia, haematoma, and reintervention were independently associated with CIED-related infection (HR 5.54, 10.77, and 12.15, respectively). Conclusion In a large cohort of patients undergoing CIED procedure, an antibiotic prophylaxis based on individual stratification of infective risk resulted in similar rate of infection between groups at high and low risk of CIED-related infection.
ISSN:1099-5129
1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euab222