Low-Level Laser and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Reduce Peri-implantitis–related Microorganisms Grown In Vitro
Abstract Objective Currently, dental implants are a predictable treatment option for oral rehabilitation; however, complications such as peri-implant diseases are increasing every day. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify the efficacy, in vitro , of two protocols against cultures of periodonta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of dentistry 2022-02, Vol.16 (1), p.161-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Objective
Currently, dental implants are a predictable treatment option for oral rehabilitation; however, complications such as peri-implant diseases are increasing every day. Thus, the aim of this study was to verify the efficacy,
in vitro
, of two protocols against cultures of periodontal biofilm and
Staphylococcus aureus
.
Material and Methods
Petri dishes for each of the following groups were used: control groups (C)—plates inoculated with periodontal biofilm (C.B;
n
= 4) or
S. aureus
(C.SA;
n
= 4) without any treatment; laser groups—plates inoculated with periodontal biofilm (low-level laser therapy [LLLT].B;
n
= 4) or
S. aureus
(LLLT.SA;
n
= 4) and treated with LLLT (660 nm, 30 mW, 50 J/cm
2
, and 47 seconds); antimicrobial photodynamic therapy groups (aPDT)—plates inoculated with periodontal biofilm (aPDT.B;
n
= 4) or
S. aureus
(aPDT.SA;
n
= 4) and treated with aPDT (red laser 660 nm, 30 mW, 50 J/cm
2
, 47 seconds + toluidine blue O (TBO) 100 µg/mL, and 1 minute). After treatments were performed, the contents of all plates were diluted and seeded for counting colony-forming units (CFUs).
Statistical Analysis
Results were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s test, comparison of percentages, and independent
t
-tests with a 5% significance level.
Results
Both treatments, LLLT and aPDT, significantly reduced the number of CFUs for the two types of culture, LLLT.B (3.69 × 10
6
± 0.20), aPDT.B (2.79 × 10
6
± 0.13), LLLT.SA (4.10 × 10
6
± 0.12), and aPDT.SA (3.23 × 10
6
± 0.10) when compared with control groups C.B (5.18 × 10
6
± 0.43) and C.SA (5.81 × 10
6
± 0.16;
p
= 0.000). When treatment groups were compared separately, there was also a statistically significant difference (
p
= 0.000). None of the protocols were able to eliminate cultured microorganisms.
Conclusion
The LLLT and aPDT protocols effectively reduced cultures of periodontal biofilm and
S. aureus in vitro
, with the superiority of aPDT. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1305-7456 1305-7464 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0041-1731926 |