Risk prediction model for deep surgical site infection (DSSI) following open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fracture

Deep surgical site infection (DSSI) is a serious complication affecting the surgical outcome of displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fracture, and a risk prediction model based on the identifiable risk factors will provide great clinical value in prevention and prompt interventions. This study retros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International wound journal 2022-03, Vol.19 (3), p.656-665
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Kaosheng, Ma, Tianxiao, Yang, Chunyan, Qu, Qiaoge, Liu, Haibo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Deep surgical site infection (DSSI) is a serious complication affecting the surgical outcome of displaced intra‐articular calcaneal fracture, and a risk prediction model based on the identifiable risk factors will provide great clinical value in prevention and prompt interventions. This study retrospectively identified patients operated for calcaneal fracture between January 2014 and December 2019, with a follow‐up ≥1 year. The data were extracted from electronic medical records, with regard to demographics, comorbidities, injury, surgery and laboratory biomarkers at admission. Univariate and multivariate logistics regression analyses were used to identify the independent factors for DSSI, thereby the risk prediction model was developed. Among 900 patients included, 2.7% developed a DSSI. The multivariate analyses identified five factors independently associated with DSSI, including current smoking (OR, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3‐6.4; P = .021), BMI ≥ 26.4 kg/m2 (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6‐8.4; P = .003), ASA ≥II (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0‐5.1; P = .043), incision level of II (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3‐12.6; P = .018) and NLR ≥6.4 (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3‐7.5; P = .008). A score of 14 as the optimal cut‐off value was corresponding to sensitivity of 0.542 and specificity of 0.872 (area, 0.766; P 
ISSN:1742-4801
1742-481X
DOI:10.1111/iwj.13663