Theory of mind, mental state talk, and discourse comprehension: Theory of mind process is more important for narrative comprehension than for informational text comprehension

•Theory of Mind (ToM) acts as an interpretive mechanism for discourse comprehension.•Mental state talk occurs more frequently in recall of narrative texts.•ToM is related to mental state talk.•ToM is more important to narrative than informational text comprehension. We investigated the relations amo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental child psychology 2021-09, Vol.209, p.105181-105181, Article 105181
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Young-Suk Grace, Dore, Rebecca, Cho, Minkyung, Golinkoff, Roberta, Amendum, Steven J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Theory of Mind (ToM) acts as an interpretive mechanism for discourse comprehension.•Mental state talk occurs more frequently in recall of narrative texts.•ToM is related to mental state talk.•ToM is more important to narrative than informational text comprehension. We investigated the relations among theory of mind (ToM), mental state talk, and discourse comprehension. Specifically, we examined the frequency of mental state talk in children’s oral recall of narrative texts and informational texts as well as relations among ToM, mental state talk (inclusion of mental state words in the recall of narrative and informational texts), and narrative and informational text comprehension. Results from children in Grade 4 (N = 132; Mage = 10.39 years) revealed that a greater number of mental state talk instances appeared in children’s recall of narrative texts than in their recall of informational texts, but the mean number also differed across texts within a genre. ToM skill predicted the extent of mental state talk in narrative texts and informational texts, and the relation was stronger for narrative texts than for informational texts, after accounting for vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, working memory, and attentional control. Mental state talk in narrative texts was extremely strongly related to narrative comprehension, whereas mental state talk in informational texts was weakly related to informational text comprehension. Results suggest that ToM skill relates to mental state talk in the recall of texts, and both ToM and mental state talk play greater roles in comprehension of narrative texts than in comprehension of informational texts.
ISSN:0022-0965
1096-0457
DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105181