Assessment of Activity and Resistance Mechanisms to Cefepime in Combination with the Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitors Zidebactam, Taniborbactam, and Enmetazobactam against a Multicenter Collection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales

The global distribution of carbapenemases such as KPC, OXA-48, and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) gives cause for concern, as these enzymes are not inhibited by classical β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs). The current development of new inhibitors is one of the most promising highlights for the treatment o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2022-02, Vol.66 (2), p.e0167621-e0167621
Hauptverfasser: Vázquez-Ucha, Juan Carlos, Lasarte-Monterrubio, Cristina, Guijarro-Sánchez, Paula, Oviaño, Marina, Álvarez-Fraga, Laura, Alonso-García, Isaac, Arca-Suárez, Jorge, Bou, German, Beceiro, Alejandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The global distribution of carbapenemases such as KPC, OXA-48, and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) gives cause for concern, as these enzymes are not inhibited by classical β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs). The current development of new inhibitors is one of the most promising highlights for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. The activity of cefepime in combination with the novel BLIs zidebactam, taniborbactam, and enmetazobactam was studied in a collection of 400 carbapenemase-producing (CPE). The genomes were fully sequenced and potential mechanisms of resistance to cefepime/BLI combinations were characterized. Cefepime resistance in the whole set of isolates was 79.5% (MIC50/90 64/≥128mg/L). The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations showed the highest activity (MIC ≤0.5/1 and ≤0.5/2 mg/L, respectively). Cefepime/zidebactam displayed high activity, regardless of the carbapenemase or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) considered (99% of isolates displayed MIC ≤2 mg/L). Cefepime/taniborbactam displayed excellent activity against OXA-48- and KPC-producing and lower activity against MBL-producing isolates (four strains yielded MICs ≥16 mg/L: 2 NDM producers with an insertion in PBP3, one VIM-1 producer with nonfunctional OmpK35, and one IMP-8 producer). Cefepime/enmetazobactam displayed the lowest activity (MIC 1/≥128 mg/L), with MICs ≥16 mg/L for 49 MBL producers, 40 OXA-48 producers (13 with amino acid changes in OmpK35/36, 4 in PBPs and 11 in RamR) and 25 KPC producers (most with an insertion in OmpK36). These results confirm the therapeutic potential of the new β-lactamase inhibitors, shedding light on the activity of cefepime and BLIs against CPE and resistance mechanisms. The cefepime/zidebactam and cefepime/taniborbactam combinations are particularly highlighted as promising alternatives to penicillin-based inhibitors for the treatment of CPE.
ISSN:0066-4804
1098-6596
DOI:10.1128/AAC.01676-21