Quantification of pulmonary perfusion abnormalities using DCE-MRI in COPD: comparison with quantitative CT and pulmonary function

Objectives Pulmonary perfusion abnormalities are prevalent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are potentially reversible, and may be associated with emphysema development. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of perfusion defects in percent (QDP) us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2022-03, Vol.32 (3), p.1879-1890
Hauptverfasser: Schiwek, Marilisa, Triphan, Simon M. F., Biederer, Jürgen, Weinheimer, Oliver, Eichinger, Monika, Vogelmeier, Claus F., Jörres, Rudolf A., Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Heußel, Claus P., Konietzke, Philip, von Stackelberg, Oyunbileg, Risse, Frank, Jobst, Bertram J., Wielpütz, Mark O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Pulmonary perfusion abnormalities are prevalent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are potentially reversible, and may be associated with emphysema development. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of perfusion defects in percent (QDP) using DCE-MRI. Methods We investigated a subset of baseline DCE-MRIs, paired inspiratory/expiratory CTs, and pulmonary function testing (PFT) of 83 subjects (age = 65.7 ± 9.0 years, patients-at-risk, and all GOLD groups) from one center of the “COSYCONET” COPD cohort. QDP was computed from DCE-MRI using an in-house developed quantification pipeline, including four different approaches: Otsu’s method, k-means clustering, texture analysis, and 80 th percentile threshold. QDP was compared with visual MRI perfusion scoring, CT parametric response mapping (PRM) indices of emphysema (PRM Emph ) and functional small airway disease (PRM fSAD ), and FEV1/FVC from PFT. Results All QDP approaches showed high correlations with the MRI perfusion score ( r  = 0.67 to 0.72, p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08229-6