Comparison of nodal staging between CT, MRI, and [18F]-FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer

Purpose To compare CT, MRI, and [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([ 18 F]-FDG PET/MRI) for nodal status, regarding quantity and location of metastatic locoregional lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Materials and methods One hundred eighty-two patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2022-02, Vol.49 (3), p.992-1001
Hauptverfasser: Morawitz, Janna, Bruckmann, Nils-Martin, Dietzel, Frederic, Ullrich, Tim, Bittner, Ann-Kathrin, Hoffmann, Oliver, Ruckhäberle, Eugen, Mohrmann, Svjetlana, Häberle, Lena, Ingenwerth, Marc, Abrar, Daniel Benjamin, Sawicki, Lino Morris, Breuckmann, Katharina, Fendler, Wolfgang Peter, Herrmann, Ken, Buchbender, Christian, Antoch, Gerald, Umutlu, Lale, Kirchner, Julian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare CT, MRI, and [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([ 18 F]-FDG PET/MRI) for nodal status, regarding quantity and location of metastatic locoregional lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Materials and methods One hundred eighty-two patients (mean age 52.7 ± 11.9 years) were included in this prospective double-center study. Patients underwent dedicated contrast-enhanced chest/abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT) and whole-body ([ 18 F]-FDG PET/) magnet resonance imaging (MRI). Thoracal datasets were evaluated separately regarding quantity, lymph node station (axillary levels I–III, supraclavicular, internal mammary chain), and lesion character (benign vs. malign). Histopathology served as reference standard for patient-based analysis. Patient-based and lesion-based analyses were compared by a McNemar test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were assessed for all three imaging modalities. Results On a patient-based analysis, PET/MRI correctly detected significantly more nodal positive patients than MRI ( p  
ISSN:1619-7070
1619-7089
DOI:10.1007/s00259-021-05502-0