A pharmacokinetics study of proposed bevacizumab biosimilar MYL-1402O vs EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab
Purpose Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-specific angiogenesis in some cancers. MYL-1402O is a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar. Methods The primary objective of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, paralle...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2022-02, Vol.148 (2), p.487-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor-specific angiogenesis in some cancers. MYL-1402O is a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar.
Methods
The primary objective of this single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, phase 1 study in healthy male volunteers was to evaluate bioequivalence of MYL-1402O to EU and US-reference bevacizumab, and EU-reference bevacizumab to US-reference bevacizumab. The primary pharmacokinetic parameter was area under the serum concentration–time curve from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC
0–∞
). Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using general linear models of analysis of variance. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.
Results
Of 111 enrolled subjects, 110 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (MYL-1402O,
n
= 37; EU-reference bevacizumab,
n
= 36; US-reference bevacizumab,
n
= 37). Bioequivalence was demonstrated between MYL-1402O and EU-reference bevacizumab, MYL-1402O and US-reference bevacizumab, and between EU- and US-reference bevacizumab where least squares mean ratios of AUC
0–∞
were close to 1, and 90% CIs were within the equivalence range (0.80–1.25). Secondary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC from 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUC
0–
t
], peak serum concentration [
C
max
], time to
C
max
, elimination rate constant, and elimination half-life) were also comparable, with 90% CIs for ratios of AUC
0–
t
and
C
max
within 80–125%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all three treatment groups and were consistent with clinical data for bevacizumab.
Conclusion
MYL-1402O was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic and safety profiles similar to EU-reference bevacizumab and US-reference bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers. No new significant safety issues emerged (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02469987; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT, 2014-005621-12; June 12, 2015). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0171-5216 1432-1335 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00432-021-03628-0 |