Chest X-ray versus chest computed tomography for outcome prediction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19
The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CT) in a group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. For this study, we retrospectively selected a cohort of 106 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent both CXR and chest CT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiologia medica 2022-03, Vol.127 (3), p.305-308 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CT) in a group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. For this study, we retrospectively selected a cohort of 106 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent both CXR and chest CT at admission. For each patient, the pulmonary involvement was ranked by applying the
Brixia
score for CXR and the percentage of well-aerated lung (WAL) for CT. The
Brixia
score was assigned at admission (A-
Brixia
score) and during hospitalization. During hospitalization, only the highest score (H-
Brixia
score) was considered. At admission, the percentage of WAL (A-CT%WAL) was quantified using a dedicated software. On logistic regression analyses, H-
Brixia
score was the most effective radiological marker for predicting in-hospital mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation. Additionally, A-CT%WAL did not provide substantial advantages in the risk stratification of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 compared to A-
Brixia
score. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1826-6983 0033-8362 1826-6983 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11547-022-01456-x |