Decline in Rehab Transfers Among Rehab-Eligible Stroke Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

To characterize differences in disposition arrangement among rehab-eligible stroke patients at a Comprehensive Stroke Center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively analyzed a prospective registry for demographics, hospital course, and discharge dispositions of rehab-eligible acu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2021-08, Vol.30 (8), p.105857-105857, Article 105857
Hauptverfasser: Thau, Lauren, Siegal, Taylor, Heslin, Mark E., Rana, Ameena, Yu, Siyuan, Kamen, Scott, Chen, Austin, Vigilante, Nicholas, Gallagher, Sheri, Wegner, Kevin, Thon, Jesse M., Then, Ryna, Patel, Pratit, Yeager, Terri, Jovin, Tudor G., Kumar, Rohini J., Owens, David E., Siegler, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To characterize differences in disposition arrangement among rehab-eligible stroke patients at a Comprehensive Stroke Center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively analyzed a prospective registry for demographics, hospital course, and discharge dispositions of rehab-eligible acute stroke survivors admitted 6 months prior to (10/2019-03/2020) and during (04/2020-09/2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) as opposed to other facilities using descriptive statistics, and IRF versus home using unadjusted and adjusted backward stepwise logistic regression. Of the 507 rehab-eligible stroke survivors, there was no difference in age, premorbid disability, or stroke severity between study periods (p>0.05). There was a 9% absolute decrease in discharges to an IRF during the pandemic (32.1% vs. 41.1%, p=0.04), which translated to 38% lower odds of being discharged to IRF versus home in unadjusted regression (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.42-0.92, p=0.016). The lower odds of discharge to IRF persisted in the multivariable model (aOR 0.16, 95%CI 0.09-0.31, p
ISSN:1052-3057
1532-8511
DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105857