Magnetic resonance neuroimaging promotes the preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a comparative study

How to preserve pelvic autonomic nerves system (PANS) in total mesorectal excision (TME) is still a technical challenge for gastrointestinal surgeons, and nerve preservation according to preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a hot topic in pelvic surgery. The purpose of this study was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of translational medicine 2021-12, Vol.9 (24), p.1756-1756
Hauptverfasser: Zhong, Guangyu, Yang, Bin, Zhong, Jinglian, Zhong, Yingkui, Zhi, Shilin, Shen, Jun, Zhou, Shengning, Tan, Jia'nan, Huang, Jing, Zhu, Jiankun, Wang, Dongye, Han, Fanghai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:How to preserve pelvic autonomic nerves system (PANS) in total mesorectal excision (TME) is still a technical challenge for gastrointestinal surgeons, and nerve preservation according to preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a hot topic in pelvic surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the postoperative urogenital function of patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent preoperative and postoperative neuroimaging of PANS vs. patients who did not. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled in a magnetic resonance neuroimaging (MRN) group from June 2018, while primary RC patients from January 2016 to May 2018 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in a non-MRN group. Patients in the MRN group underwent MRN examination before operation and 6 months after operation, while those in the non-MRN group were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Based on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) scores at 6 months, the postoperative urinary and sexual function of male patients in the MRN group were significantly better than that in the non-MRN group (P
ISSN:2305-5839
2305-5839
DOI:10.21037/atm-21-5658