Smartphone‐Based Applications to Detect Hearing Loss: A Review of Current Technology

Background/Objectives Age‐related hearing loss (ARHL) is a widely prevalent yet manageable condition that has been linked to neurocognitive and psychiatric comorbidities. Multiple barriers hinder older individuals from being diagnosed with ARHL through pure‐tone audiometry. This is especially true d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2021-02, Vol.69 (2), p.307-316
Hauptverfasser: Irace, Alexandria L., Sharma, Rahul K., Reed, Nicholas S., Golub, Justin S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Objectives Age‐related hearing loss (ARHL) is a widely prevalent yet manageable condition that has been linked to neurocognitive and psychiatric comorbidities. Multiple barriers hinder older individuals from being diagnosed with ARHL through pure‐tone audiometry. This is especially true during the COVID‐19 pandemic, which has resulted in the closure of many outpatient audiology and otolaryngology offices. Smartphone‐based hearing assessment apps may overcome these challenges by enabling patients to remotely self‐administer their own hearing examination. The objective of this review is to provide an up‐to‐date overview of current mobile health applications (apps) that claim to assess hearing. Design Narrative review. Measurements The Apple App Store and Google Play Store were queried for apps that claim to assess hearing. Relevant apps were downloaded and used to conduct a mock hearing assessment. Names of included apps were searched on four literature databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to determine which apps had been validated against gold standard methods. Results App store searches identified 44 unique apps. Apps differed with respect to the type of test offered (e.g., hearing threshold test), cost, strategies to reduce ambient noise, test output (quantitative vs qualitative results), and options to export results. Validation studies were identified for seven apps. Conclusion Given their low cost and relative accessibility, smartphone‐based hearing apps may facilitate screening for ARHL, particularly in the setting of limitations on in‐person medical care due to COVID‐19. However, app features vary widely, few apps have been validated, and user‐centered designs for older adults are largely lacking. Further research and validation efforts are necessary to determine whether smartphone‐based hearing assessments are a feasible and accurate screening tool for ARHL. Key Points Age‐related hearing loss is a prevalent yet undertreated condition among older adults. Why Does this Paper Matter?     Smartphone‐based hearing test apps may facilitate remote screening for hearing loss, but limitations surrounding app validation, usability, equipment calibration, and data security should be addressed.
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/jgs.16985