Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review

Purpose Social media may be particularly valuable in research in rare genetic diseases because of the low numbers of patients and the rare disease community’s robust online presence. The goal of this systematic review was to understand how social media is currently used in rare disease research and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.2250-2259
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Emily G., Woodward, Amanda L., Flinchum, Grace, Young, Jennifer L., Tabor, Holly K., Halley, Meghan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Social media may be particularly valuable in research in rare genetic diseases because of the low numbers of patients and the rare disease community’s robust online presence. The goal of this systematic review was to understand how social media is currently used in rare disease research and the characteristics of the participants in these studies. Methods We conducted a systematic review of six databases to identify studies published in English between January 2004 and November 2020, of which 120 met inclusion criteria. Results Most studies were observational ( n  = 114, 95.0%) and cross-sectional ( n  = 107, 89.2%), and more than half ( n  = 69, 57.5%) utilized only surveys. Only 101 rare diseases were included across all studies. Participant demographics, when reported, were predominantly female (70.1% ± 22.5%) and white (85.0% ± 11.0%) adult patients and caregivers. Conclusion Despite its potential benefits in rare disease research, the use of social media is still methodologically limited and the participants reached may not be representative of the rare disease population by gender, race, age, or rare disease type. As scholars explore using social media for rare disease research, careful attention should be paid to representativeness when studying this diverse patient community.
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
DOI:10.1038/s41436-021-01273-z