Antibiotic Use in Patients With β-Lactam Allergies and Pneumonia: Impact of an Antibiotic Side Chain–Based Cross-Reactivity Chart Combined With Enhanced Allergy Assessment

Abstract Background β-lactam antibiotics with dissimilar R-group side chains are associated with low cross-reactivity. Despite this, patients with β-lactam allergies are often treated with non-β-lactam alternative antibiotics. An institutional β-lactam side chain–based cross-reactivity chart was dev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open forum infectious diseases 2022-01, Vol.9 (1), p.ofab544-ofab544
Hauptverfasser: Collins, Curtis D, Bookal, Renee S, Malani, Anurag N, Leo, Harvey L, Shankar, Tara, Scheidel, Caleb, West, Nina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background β-lactam antibiotics with dissimilar R-group side chains are associated with low cross-reactivity. Despite this, patients with β-lactam allergies are often treated with non-β-lactam alternative antibiotics. An institutional β-lactam side chain–based cross-reactivity chart was developed and implemented to guide in antibiotic selection for patients with β-lactam allergies. Methods This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed the impact of the implementation of the cross-reactivity chart for patients with pneumonia. Study time periods were defined as January 2013 to October 2014 prior to implementation of the chart (historical cohort) and January 2017 to October 2018 (intervention cohort) following implementation. The primary outcome was the incidence of β-lactam utilization between time periods. Propensity-weighted scoring and interrupted time-series analyses compared outcomes. Results A total of 341 and 623 patient encounters were included in the historical and intervention cohorts, respectively. There was a significantly greater use of β-lactams in the intervention cohort (70.4% vs 89.3%; P 
ISSN:2328-8957
2328-8957
DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofab544