Barriers and facilitators to implementing telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis of interviews with cystic fibrosis care team members

•Programs commonly found telehealth more difficult to implement than in-person care.•Some programs embraced telehealth and saw advantages over in-person care.•Telehealth was supported by effective technology, fit with workflows, and planning.•Barriers included software capabilities, and lack of reso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cystic fibrosis 2021-12, Vol.20, p.23-28
Hauptverfasser: Van Citters, Aricca D., Dieni, Olivia, Scalia, Peter, Dowd, Christopher, Sabadosa, Kathryn A., Fliege, Jill D., Jain, Manu, Miller, Robert W., Ren, Clement L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Programs commonly found telehealth more difficult to implement than in-person care.•Some programs embraced telehealth and saw advantages over in-person care.•Telehealth was supported by effective technology, fit with workflows, and planning.•Barriers included software capabilities, and lack of resources or prioritization.•Policies supported telehealth reimbursement, yet barriers to billing remained. The COVID-19 pandemic forced cystic fibrosis (CF) care programs to rapidly shift from in-person care delivery to telehealth. Our objective was to provide a qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to: 1) implementing high-quality telehealth and 2) navigating reimbursement for telehealth services. We used data from the 2020 State of Care CF Program Survey (n=286 U.S. care programs) administered in August-September to identify two cohorts of programs, with variation in telehealth quality (n=12 programs) and reimbursement (n=8 programs). We conducted focus groups and semi-structured interviews with CF program directors and coordinators in December 2020, approximately 9 months from onset of the pandemic. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify facilitators and barriers of implementation, and inductive thematic analysis to identify facilitators and barriers of reimbursement. Factors differentiating programs with greater and lower perceived telehealth quality included telehealth characteristics (perceived advantage over in-person care, cost, platform quality); external influences (needs and resources of those served by the CF program), characteristics of the CF program (compatibility with workflows, relative priority, available resources); characteristics of team members (individual stage of change), and processes for implementation (engaging patients and teams). Reimbursement barriers included documentation to optimize billing; reimbursement of multi-disciplinary team members, remote monitoring, and telephone-only telehealth; and lower volume of patients. A number of factors are associated with successful implementation and reimbursement of telehealth. Future efforts should provide guidance and incentives that support telehealth delivery and infrastructure, share best practices across CF programs, and remove barriers.
ISSN:1569-1993
1873-5010
DOI:10.1016/j.jcf.2021.09.004