A Cleft-Customized Occlusal Rating System to Assess Orthodontic Occlusal Improvement in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Objective: This study aimed to develop a new method to quantify occlusal improvement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone orthodontic treatment and to evaluate its reproducibility. Design: A panel of orthodontists decided on the relevance of different occlusal fe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2022-01, Vol.59 (1), p.54-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective:
This study aimed to develop a new method to quantify occlusal improvement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who had undergone orthodontic treatment and to evaluate its reproducibility.
Design:
A panel of orthodontists decided on the relevance of different occlusal features to score initial and final 3-dimensional study models and panoramic radiographs. A subsequent subjective analysis was later performed by a local orthodontic panel.
Setting:
The sample was obtained from the orthodontic clinical archives of a hospital known for the treatment of patients with craniofacial differences.
Patients:
Thirty-one nonsyndromic patients, 17 males and 14 females, were randomly selected according to preestablished inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Interventions:
The records corresponded to the period during which the patients were treated with conventional multibracket mechanics and adjunctive restorative procedures.
Main Outcome/Measures:
The intraclass correlation coefficient measured intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements. The Spearman correlation test assessed the relationship between the local orthodontic panel perception and the improvement scores.
Results:
Inter- and intra-rater ICCs varied between fair/good to excellent. There was a strong correlation between the Cleft-Customized Occlusal Rating system classification of occlusal improvement and the local orthodontic panel’s perception, thereby enabling the utilization of the interpretation scale by the panel.
Conclusions:
The method showed to be a useful tool in quantifying and classifying occlusal improvement in this specific population. As any other method, some limitations apply and need to be accounted for. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1055665621995313 |