High ovarian response to ovarian stimulation: effect on morphokinetic milestones and cycle outcomes

Purpose To assess the effect of high ovarian response on oocyte quality and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study conducted at three IVF units. The high ovarian response (HOR) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with HOR (PCOS HOR) groups included 151 and 13 women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2021-12, Vol.38 (12), p.3083-3090
Hauptverfasser: Schachter-Safrai, Natali, Karavani, Gilad, Esh-Broder, Efrat, Levitas, Eliahu, Wainstock, Tamar, Har-Vardi, Iris, Ben-Meir, Assaf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To assess the effect of high ovarian response on oocyte quality and ovarian stimulation cycle outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort study conducted at three IVF units. The high ovarian response (HOR) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with HOR (PCOS HOR) groups included 151 and 13 women who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) resulting in more than 15 retrieved oocytes, for a total of 1863 and 116 cultured embryos, respectively. The normal ovarian response (NOR) group comprised 741 women with 6–15 retrieved oocytes, resulting in 4907 cultured embryos. Data collected included fresh cycle data and pregnancy rates, in addition to annotation of morphokinetic events from time of pronuclei fading to time of initiation of blastocyst formation of embryos cultured in a time lapse incubator, including occurrence of direct unequal cleavage at first cleavage (DUC-1) (less than 5 h from two to three blastomeres). Comparison was made between morphokinetic parameters between the 3 groups. Cycle outcomes were compared in the high vs. normal ovarian response groups. Results Oocyte maturation rate was significantly lower in the HOR vs. NOR groups (56.5% vs. 90.0%, p  
ISSN:1058-0468
1573-7330
DOI:10.1007/s10815-021-02323-w