Estimating survival and choosing treatment for spinal metastases: Do spine surgeons agree with each other?

This study aimed to investigate spine surgeons’ ability to estimate survival in patients with spinal metastases and whether survival estimates influence treatment recommendations. 60 Spine surgeons were asked a survival estimate and treatment recommendation in 12 cases. Intraclass correlation coeffi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedics 2021-11, Vol.28, p.134-139
Hauptverfasser: Thio, Quirina C.B.S., Paulino Pereira, Nuno Rui, van Wulfften Palthe, Olivier, Sciubba, Daniel M., Bramer, Jos A.M., Schwab, Joseph H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to investigate spine surgeons’ ability to estimate survival in patients with spinal metastases and whether survival estimates influence treatment recommendations. 60 Spine surgeons were asked a survival estimate and treatment recommendation in 12 cases. Intraclass correlation coefficients and descriptive statistics were used to evaluate variability, accuracy and association of survival estimates with treatment recommendation. There was substantial variability in survival estimates amongst the spine surgeons. Survival was generally overestimated, and longer estimated survival seemed to lead to more invasive procedures. Prognostic models to estimate survival may aid surgeons treating patients with spinal metastases.
ISSN:0972-978X
0972-978X
DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2021.11.015