DEFINING THE MEDICAL RECORD: RELATIONSHIPS OF THE LEGAL MEDICAL RECORD, THE DESIGNATED RECORD SET, AND THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD

Not so long ago, defining the "medical record" was simple. It was the paper chart-volume upon volume that captured the serial, dutifully recorded events of a person's health care at a hospital or physician's office. Entries were typically handwritten, dated and timed, and signed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perspectives in health information management 2021, Vol.18 (4), p.1h-1h
Hauptverfasser: Floyd, Phyllis T, Oates, Jim C, Acker, Julie W, Warren, Robert W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Not so long ago, defining the "medical record" was simple. It was the paper chart-volume upon volume that captured the serial, dutifully recorded events of a person's health care at a hospital or physician's office. Entries were typically handwritten, dated and timed, and signed in ink with title (i.e., authenticated). Errors were easily identified by an authenticated strike-through. Similarly, the paper chart was synonymous with the legal medical record (LMR). In other words, a patient's paper chart was that patient's LMR by definition, even if critical data was omitted or irrelevant data was included. Fast-forward to 2021 and the use of technology for capturing the record of a patient's care. Technology has brought new challenges as well as successes. For example, pervasive and persistent mythologies include that 1) a patient's electronic health record (EHR) is the LMR, and 2) patient-specific EHR printouts to paper or disc-or displays on monitors-are necessarily equivalents to the paper chart of the 1980s. Neither are true. We now must define at the outset what is included in the LMR/designated record set to ensure the accuracy of what is retained and released.
ISSN:1559-4122