Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17

Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the Uni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied gerontology 2021-06, Vol.41 (4), p.918-927
Hauptverfasser: Rosen, Tony, Wen, Katherine, Makaroun, Lena K., Elman, Alyssa, Zhang, Yiye, Jeng, Philip J., LoFaso, Veronica M., Lachs, Mark S., Clark, Sunday, Bao, Yuhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 927
container_issue 4
container_start_page 918
container_title Journal of applied gerontology
container_volume 41
creator Rosen, Tony
Wen, Katherine
Makaroun, Lena K.
Elman, Alyssa
Zhang, Yiye
Jeng, Philip J.
LoFaso, Veronica M.
Lachs, Mark S.
Clark, Sunday
Bao, Yuhua
description Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the United States from 2011–2017. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify cases, examining the impact of transition from ICD-9 (Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 (Tenth Revision), which occurred in October 2015 and added 14 new codes for “suspected” mistreatment. 8,127 patients (0.051% of all aged ≥65), including 6,304 with MA (0.058%) and 1,823 with private insurance (0.026%) received elder mistreatment diagnosis. Transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was associated with a small increase in diagnosis rate, with “suspected” codes used in 45.3% of ICD-10 vs. 9.7% of ICD-9 cases. Overall rates remained low. Rates, settings, and types of diagnosis differed between MA and private insurance patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/07334648211018530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8636549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8636549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_86365493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljL1OwzAURi0EouHnAdjuA1Cw4_zBgITaIhiKKsQe3cY3wSixK9uJxMbamTfkSUgkFmambzjfOYxdCH4lRJ5f81zKJEuKWAguilTyAxaJNI3nSRrLQxZNfD4dZuzE-3fO-QjFMZvJhOdpIXnE9kuNjbE-6AoWVmnTgK1h1SpysNY-OMLQkQm38EK-b4OH2tkOEJ4xaGuwhSUG3KKnyVuT0hU6gns1oAnYEKBRsHF6wEDwZHzv0FQEm9Eeq_4SYi7E9-eXyM_YUY2tp_PfPWV3D6vXxeN81287UtV4d9iWO6c7dB-lRV3-JUa_lY0dyiKTWZrcyH8HfgAmtXIz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Rosen, Tony ; Wen, Katherine ; Makaroun, Lena K. ; Elman, Alyssa ; Zhang, Yiye ; Jeng, Philip J. ; LoFaso, Veronica M. ; Lachs, Mark S. ; Clark, Sunday ; Bao, Yuhua</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Tony ; Wen, Katherine ; Makaroun, Lena K. ; Elman, Alyssa ; Zhang, Yiye ; Jeng, Philip J. ; LoFaso, Veronica M. ; Lachs, Mark S. ; Clark, Sunday ; Bao, Yuhua</creatorcontrib><description>Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the United States from 2011–2017. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify cases, examining the impact of transition from ICD-9 (Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 (Tenth Revision), which occurred in October 2015 and added 14 new codes for “suspected” mistreatment. 8,127 patients (0.051% of all aged ≥65), including 6,304 with MA (0.058%) and 1,823 with private insurance (0.026%) received elder mistreatment diagnosis. Transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was associated with a small increase in diagnosis rate, with “suspected” codes used in 45.3% of ICD-10 vs. 9.7% of ICD-9 cases. Overall rates remained low. Rates, settings, and types of diagnosis differed between MA and private insurance patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-4648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/07334648211018530</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34075830</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of applied gerontology, 2021-06, Vol.41 (4), p.918-927</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaroun, Lena K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elman, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LoFaso, Veronica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachs, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Sunday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yuhua</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17</title><title>Journal of applied gerontology</title><description>Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the United States from 2011–2017. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify cases, examining the impact of transition from ICD-9 (Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 (Tenth Revision), which occurred in October 2015 and added 14 new codes for “suspected” mistreatment. 8,127 patients (0.051% of all aged ≥65), including 6,304 with MA (0.058%) and 1,823 with private insurance (0.026%) received elder mistreatment diagnosis. Transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was associated with a small increase in diagnosis rate, with “suspected” codes used in 45.3% of ICD-10 vs. 9.7% of ICD-9 cases. Overall rates remained low. Rates, settings, and types of diagnosis differed between MA and private insurance patients.</description><issn>0733-4648</issn><issn>1552-4523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljL1OwzAURi0EouHnAdjuA1Cw4_zBgITaIhiKKsQe3cY3wSixK9uJxMbamTfkSUgkFmambzjfOYxdCH4lRJ5f81zKJEuKWAguilTyAxaJNI3nSRrLQxZNfD4dZuzE-3fO-QjFMZvJhOdpIXnE9kuNjbE-6AoWVmnTgK1h1SpysNY-OMLQkQm38EK-b4OH2tkOEJ4xaGuwhSUG3KKnyVuT0hU6gns1oAnYEKBRsHF6wEDwZHzv0FQEm9Eeq_4SYi7E9-eXyM_YUY2tp_PfPWV3D6vXxeN81287UtV4d9iWO6c7dB-lRV3-JUa_lY0dyiKTWZrcyH8HfgAmtXIz</recordid><startdate>20210602</startdate><enddate>20210602</enddate><creator>Rosen, Tony</creator><creator>Wen, Katherine</creator><creator>Makaroun, Lena K.</creator><creator>Elman, Alyssa</creator><creator>Zhang, Yiye</creator><creator>Jeng, Philip J.</creator><creator>LoFaso, Veronica M.</creator><creator>Lachs, Mark S.</creator><creator>Clark, Sunday</creator><creator>Bao, Yuhua</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210602</creationdate><title>Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17</title><author>Rosen, Tony ; Wen, Katherine ; Makaroun, Lena K. ; Elman, Alyssa ; Zhang, Yiye ; Jeng, Philip J. ; LoFaso, Veronica M. ; Lachs, Mark S. ; Clark, Sunday ; Bao, Yuhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_86365493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosen, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaroun, Lena K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elman, Alyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LoFaso, Veronica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lachs, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Sunday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Yuhua</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied gerontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosen, Tony</au><au>Wen, Katherine</au><au>Makaroun, Lena K.</au><au>Elman, Alyssa</au><au>Zhang, Yiye</au><au>Jeng, Philip J.</au><au>LoFaso, Veronica M.</au><au>Lachs, Mark S.</au><au>Clark, Sunday</au><au>Bao, Yuhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied gerontology</jtitle><date>2021-06-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>918-927</pages><issn>0733-4648</issn><eissn>1552-4523</eissn><abstract>Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the United States from 2011–2017. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify cases, examining the impact of transition from ICD-9 (Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 (Tenth Revision), which occurred in October 2015 and added 14 new codes for “suspected” mistreatment. 8,127 patients (0.051% of all aged ≥65), including 6,304 with MA (0.058%) and 1,823 with private insurance (0.026%) received elder mistreatment diagnosis. Transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was associated with a small increase in diagnosis rate, with “suspected” codes used in 45.3% of ICD-10 vs. 9.7% of ICD-9 cases. Overall rates remained low. Rates, settings, and types of diagnosis differed between MA and private insurance patients.</abstract><pmid>34075830</pmid><doi>10.1177/07334648211018530</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-4648
ispartof Journal of applied gerontology, 2021-06, Vol.41 (4), p.918-927
issn 0733-4648
1552-4523
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8636549
source SAGE Complete
title Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20Coding%20of%20Elder%20Mistreatment:%20Results%20from%20a%20National%20Database%20of%20Medicare%20Advantage%20and%20Private%20Insurance%20Patients,%202011%E2%80%9317&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20gerontology&rft.au=Rosen,%20Tony&rft.date=2021-06-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=918-927&rft.issn=0733-4648&rft.eissn=1552-4523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/07334648211018530&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8636549%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34075830&rfr_iscdi=true