Diagnostic Coding of Elder Mistreatment: Results from a National Database of Medicare Advantage and Private Insurance Patients, 2011–17

Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the Uni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied gerontology 2021-06, Vol.41 (4), p.918-927
Hauptverfasser: Rosen, Tony, Wen, Katherine, Makaroun, Lena K., Elman, Alyssa, Zhang, Yiye, Jeng, Philip J., LoFaso, Veronica M., Lachs, Mark S., Clark, Sunday, Bao, Yuhua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Health care providers may play an important role in detection of elder mistreatment, which is common but under-recognized. We used the Health Care Cost Institute insurance claims database to describe elder mistreatment diagnosis among Medicare Advantage (MA) and private insurance patients in the United States from 2011–2017. We used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding to identify cases, examining the impact of transition from ICD-9 (Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 (Tenth Revision), which occurred in October 2015 and added 14 new codes for “suspected” mistreatment. 8,127 patients (0.051% of all aged ≥65), including 6,304 with MA (0.058%) and 1,823 with private insurance (0.026%) received elder mistreatment diagnosis. Transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 was associated with a small increase in diagnosis rate, with “suspected” codes used in 45.3% of ICD-10 vs. 9.7% of ICD-9 cases. Overall rates remained low. Rates, settings, and types of diagnosis differed between MA and private insurance patients.
ISSN:0733-4648
1552-4523
DOI:10.1177/07334648211018530