Design Requirements for Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract Background  As numerous repairs, reconstructions, and replacements have been used following scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury, there is a need to define the structural requirements for any reconstruction or replacement. Methods  Research has been conducted on the force needed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of wrist surgery 2021-12, Vol.10 (6), p.484-491
1. Verfasser: Werner, Frederick W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background  As numerous repairs, reconstructions, and replacements have been used following scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) injury, there is a need to define the structural requirements for any reconstruction or replacement. Methods  Research has been conducted on the force needed to keep the scaphoid and lunate reduced following simulated injury, the failure force of the native SLIL and various replacements, the stiffness of the SLIL and replacements, and the torsional resistance of the scaphoid relative to the lunate. Results  Forces on the order of 50 N are needed to keep the scaphoid and lunate reduced during simple wrist motions in the chronically injured wrist. Even greater forces (up to 110 N) are needed to keep the bones reduced during strenuous activities, such as pushups. The failure force of the entire SLIL has been reported to be as high as 350 N and the failure force of just the dorsal component of the SLIL to be 270 N. Conclusions  The design requirements for a reconstruction or repair may vary depending upon the demands of the patient. In a high demand patient, a reconstruction needs to support the above-mentioned forces during cyclic loading (50 N), when performing strenuous activities (110 N), or during a fall (at least 350 N). Any artificial replacement must undergo careful biocompatibility testing.
ISSN:2163-3916
2163-3924
DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1728802