Reinterventions after damage control surgery

Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) Colombia), 2021-04, Vol.52 (2), p.e4154805
Hauptverfasser: Mejia, David, Warr, Salin Pereira, Delgado-López, Carlos Andrés, Salcedo, Alexander, Rodríguez-Holguín, Fernando, Serna, José Julián, Caicedo, Yaset, Pino, Luis Fernando, González-Hadad, Adolfo, Herrera, Mario Alain, Parra, Michael W, García, Alberto, Ordoñez, Carlos A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interventions of patients undergoing damage control surgery. We suggest packing as the preferred bleeding control strategy, followed by unpacking within the next 48-72 hours. In addition, a deferred anastomosis is recommended for correction of intestinal lesions, and patients treated with vascular shunts should be re-intervened within 24 hours for definitive management. Furthermore, abdominal or thoracic wall closure should be attempted within eight days. These strategies aim to decrease complications, morbidity, and mortality.
ISSN:0120-8322
1657-9534
DOI:10.25100/CM.V52I2.4805