Lymphovascular invasion quantification could improve risk prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma

Aim To quantify lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and to assess the prognostic value in patients with pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods In this nationwide, retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they were treated with surgery or endoscopic resection for pT1b esophageal adenocarcinom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:United European gastroenterology journal 2021-11, Vol.9 (9), p.1066-1073
Hauptverfasser: Ven, Steffi E. M., Suzuki, Lucia, Gotink, Annieke W., ten Kate, Fiebo J. C., Nieboer, Daan, Weusten, Bas L. A. M., Brosens, Lodewijk A. A., Hillegersberg, Richard, Alvarez Herrero, Lorenza, Seldenrijk, Cees A., Alkhalaf, Alaa, Moll, Freek C. P., Curvers, Wouter, Lijnschoten, Ineke G., Tang, Thjon J., Valk, Hans, Nagengast, Wouter B., Kats‐Ugurlu, Gursah, Plukker, John T. M., Houben, Martin H. M. G., Laan, Jaap S., Pouw, Roos E., Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M., Meijer, Sybren L., Berge Henegouwen, Mark I., Wijnhoven, Bas P. L., Jonge, Pieter J. F., Doukas, Michael, Bruno, Marco J., Biermann, Katharina, Koch, Arjun D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim To quantify lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and to assess the prognostic value in patients with pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods In this nationwide, retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they were treated with surgery or endoscopic resection for pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Primary endpoint was the presence of metastases, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases, in surgical resection specimens or during follow‐up. A prediction model to identify risk factors for metastases was developed and internally validated. Results 248 patients were included. LVI was distributed as follows: no LVI (n = 196; 79.0%), 1 LVI focus (n = 16; 6.5%), 2–3 LVI foci (n = 21; 8.5%) and ≥4 LVI foci (n = 15; 6.0%). Seventy‐eight patients had metastases. The risk of metastases was increased for tumors with 2–3 LVI foci [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 3.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10–5.47] and ≥4 LVI foci (SHR 3.81, 95% CI 2.37–6.10). The prediction model demonstrated a good discriminative ability (c‐statistic 0.81). Conclusion The risk of metastases is higher when more LVI foci are present. Quantification of LVI could be useful for a more precise risk estimation of metastases. This model needs to be externally validated before implementation into clinical practice.
ISSN:2050-6406
2050-6414
DOI:10.1002/ueg2.12151