Design and characterization of a 3D‐printed axon‐mimetic phantom for diffusion MRI

Purpose To introduce and characterize inexpensive and easily produced 3D‐printed axon‐mimetic diffusion MRI phantoms in terms of pore geometry and diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics. Methods Phantoms were 3D‐printed with a composite printing material that, after the dissolution of the polyvinyl alco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2021-11, Vol.86 (5), p.2482-2496
Hauptverfasser: Mushtaha, Farah N., Kuehn, Tristan K., El‐Deeb, Omar, Rohani, Seyed A., Helpard, Luke W., Moore, John, Ladak, Hanif, Moehring, Amanda, Baron, Corey A., Khan, Ali R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To introduce and characterize inexpensive and easily produced 3D‐printed axon‐mimetic diffusion MRI phantoms in terms of pore geometry and diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics. Methods Phantoms were 3D‐printed with a composite printing material that, after the dissolution of the polyvinyl alcohol, exhibits microscopic fibrous pores. Confocal microscopy and synchrotron phase‐contrast micro‐CT imaging were performed to visualize and assess the pore sizes. Diffusion MRI scans of four identical phantoms and phantoms with varying print parameters in water were performed at 9.4 T. Diffusion kurtosis imaging was fit to both data sets and used to assess the reproducibility between phantoms and effects of print parameters on diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics. Identical scans were performed 25 and 76 days later, to test their stability. Results Segmentation of pores in three microscopy images yielded a mean, median, and SD of equivalent pore diameters of 7.57 μm, 3.51 μm, and 12.13 μm, respectively. Phantoms had T1/T2 = 2 seconds/180 ms, and those with identical parameters showed a low coefficient of variation (~10%) in mean diffusivity (1.38 × 10−3 mm2/s) and kurtosis (0.52) metrics and radial diffusivity (1.01 × 10−3 mm2/s) and kurtosis (1.13) metrics. Printing temperature and speed had a small effect on diffusion kurtosis imaging metrics (< 16%), whereas infill density had a larger and more variable effect (> 16%). The stability analysis showed small changes over 2.5 months (< 7%). Conclusion Three‐dimension‐printed axon‐mimetic phantoms can mimic the fibrous structure of axon bundles on a microscopic scale, serving as complex, anisotropic diffusion MRI phantoms.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.28886