Effect of the emulsifier type on the physicochemical stability and in vitro digestibility of a lutein/zeaxanthin-enriched emulsion

Lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z), as macular pigments, are water-insoluble, chemically unstable, and have low bioaccessibilities; they are often emulsified to overcome these limitations. This study investigated the impact of various emulsifiers (ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE); Tween 80; and sodium dodecy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food science and biotechnology 2021-11, Vol.30 (12), p.1509-1518
Hauptverfasser: Jeong, Su-Jin, Kim, Sunbin, Echeverria-Jaramillo, Esteban, Shin, Weon-Sun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z), as macular pigments, are water-insoluble, chemically unstable, and have low bioaccessibilities; they are often emulsified to overcome these limitations. This study investigated the impact of various emulsifiers (ethyl lauroyl arginate (LAE); Tween 80; and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) on the physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibilities of L/Z-fortified oil-in-water emulsions. Droplet aggregation and creaming extents were dependent on the emulsifier type. The ζ-potentials of emulsions stabilized by LAE, Tween 80, and SDS were + 87, − 26, and − 95 mV, respectively. SDS-stabilized emulsion had the smallest particles, while the particle sizes for the LAE- and Tween 80-stabilized emulsions were larger and not significantly different. The rates of L/Z degradation were sensitive to the emulsifier type and to heat, not to light. The L/Z bioaccessibility was the highest for the Tween 80 emulsion. Surfactants should therefore be carefully selected to optimize L/Z physicochemical stability and bioaccessibility in emulsions.
ISSN:1226-7708
2092-6456
DOI:10.1007/s10068-021-00987-9