Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer

Background Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP). Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2021-12, Vol.28 (13), p.9179-9187
Hauptverfasser: Mori, Keiichiro, Sharma, Vidit, Comperat, Eva M., Sato, Shun, Laukhtina, Ekaterina, Schuettfort, Victor M., Pradere, Benjamin, Sari Motlagh, Reza, Mostafaei, Hadi, Quhal, Fahad, Kardoust Parizi, Mehdi, Abufaraj, Mohammad, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Egawa, Shin, Tilki, Derya, Boorjian, Stephen A., Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, and a total of 1791 patients (GS 3 + 5: 190; GS 4 + 4: 1557; and GS 5 + 3: 44) with biopsy GG 4 were included for analysis. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with high-risk surgical pathologic features. Cox regression models were used to analyze time-dependent oncologic endpoints. Results Over a median follow-up of 75 months, 750 patients (41.9%) experienced BCR, 146 (8.2%) died of any causes, and 57 (3.2%) died of PC. Biopsy GS 5 + 3 was associated with significantly higher rates of GS upgrading in RP specimens than GS 3 + 5 and GS 4 + 4. On multivariable analysis adjusted for clinicopathologic features, different GSs within GG 4 were significantly associated with BCR ( p  = 0.03) but not PC-specific or all-cause mortality. Study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation. Conclusions Patients with GG 4 at biopsy exhibited some limited biological and clinical heterogeneity. Specifically, GS 5 + 3 had an increased risk of GS upgrading. This can help individualize patients’ counseling and encourage further study to refine biopsy specimen-based GG classification.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x