Use and outcomes of cerebral embolic protection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A US nationwide study
Background Outcomes data on the use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CPDs) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain limited. Previous randomized trials were underpowered for primary outcomes of stroke prevention and mortality. Methods The National Inpatient Sample and Nationw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2021-11, Vol.98 (5), p.959-968 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Outcomes data on the use of cerebral embolic protection devices (CPDs) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain limited. Previous randomized trials were underpowered for primary outcomes of stroke prevention and mortality.
Methods
The National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Readmissions Database were queried from 2017 to 2018 to study utilization and inpatient mortality, neurological complications (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and transient ischemic attack), procedural complications, resource utilization, and 30‐day readmissions with and without use of CPD. A 1:3 ratio propensity score matched model was created.
Results
Among 108,315 weighted encounters, CPD was used in 4380 patients (4.0%). Adjusted mortality was lower in patients undergoing TAVR with CPD (1.3% vs. 0.5%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.29842 |