Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility
Background Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2021-11, Vol.2021 (11), p.CD005356-CD005356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the most effective. This is an update of the review, first published in 2007.
Objectives
To assess the effects of agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination in infertile ovulatory women.
Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trial registers from their inception to November 2020. We performed reference checking and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.
Selection criteria
We included truly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different agents for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI for infertile ovulatory women concerning couples with unexplained infertility. mild male factor infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis.
Data collection and analysis
We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.
Main results
In this updated review, we have included a total of 82 studies, involving 12,614 women. Due to the multitude of comparisons between different agents for ovarian stimulation, we highlight the seven most often reported here.
Gonadotropins versus anti‐oestrogens (13 studies)
For live birth, the results of five studies were pooled and showed a probable improvement in the cumulative live birth rate for gonadotropins compared to anti‐oestrogens (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.79; I2 = 30%; 5 studies, 1924 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti‐oestrogens is assumed to be 22.8%, the chance following gonadotropins would be between 23.7% and 34.6%. The pooled effect of seven studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with anti‐oestrogens (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.17; I2 = 58%; 7 studies, 2139 participants; low‐certainty evidence).
Aromatase inhibitors versus anti‐oestrogens (8 studies)
One study reported live birth rates for this comparison. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors improve live birth rate compared with anti‐oestrogens (OR 0.75, CI 95% 0.51 to 1.11; 1 study, 599 participants; low‐certainty evi |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-1858 1465-1858 1469-493X |
DOI: | 10.1002/14651858.CD005356.pub3 |