Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer

Purpose To address demands for timely germline information to guide treatments, we evaluated experiences of patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer with a mainstreaming genetic testing model wherein multigene panel testing was ordered by oncologists with standardized pretest patient e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.2105-2113
Hauptverfasser: Hamilton, Jada G., Symecko, Heather, Spielman, Kelsey, Breen, Kelsey, Mueller, Rebecca, Catchings, Amanda, Trottier, Magan, Salo-Mullen, Erin E., Shah, Ibrahim, Arutyunova, Anna, Batson, Melissa, Gebert, Rebecca, Pundock, Stacy, Schofield, Elizabeth, Offit, Kenneth, Stadler, Zsofia K., Cadoo, Karen, Carlo, Maria I., Narayan, Vivek, Reiss, Kim A., Robson, Mark E., Domchek, Susan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To address demands for timely germline information to guide treatments, we evaluated experiences of patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer with a mainstreaming genetic testing model wherein multigene panel testing was ordered by oncologists with standardized pretest patient education, and genetic counselors delivered results and post-test genetic counseling via telephone. Methods Among 1,203 eligible patients, we conducted a prospective single-arm study to examine patient uptake and acceptability (via self-report surveys at baseline and three weeks and three months following result return) of this mainstreaming model. Results Only 10% of eligible patients declined participation. Among 1,054 tested participants, 10% had pathogenic variants (PV), 16% had variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and 74% had no variant identified (NV). Participants reported high initial acceptability, including high satisfaction with their testing decision. Variability over time in several outcomes existed for participants with PV or NV: those with NV experienced a temporary increase in depression ( p Time  
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
DOI:10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2