Development of Novel PCR Assays for Improved Detection of Enterovirus D68

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) causes a range of clinical manifestations, including asthma-like illness, severe respiratory disease, and acute flaccid myelitis. EV-D68 has caused worldwide outbreaks since 2014 and is now recognized as a reemerging infection in many countries. EV-D68-specific PCR assays ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2021-10, Vol.59 (11), p.e0115121-e0115121
Hauptverfasser: Ikuse, Tatsuki, Aizawa, Yuta, Takihara, Hayato, Okuda, Shujiro, Watanabe, Kanako, Saitoh, Akihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) causes a range of clinical manifestations, including asthma-like illness, severe respiratory disease, and acute flaccid myelitis. EV-D68 has caused worldwide outbreaks since 2014 and is now recognized as a reemerging infection in many countries. EV-D68-specific PCR assays are widely used for the diagnosis of EV-D68 infection; however, assay sensitivity is a concern because of genetic changes in recently circulated EV-D68. To address this, we summarized EV-D68 sequences from previously reported world outbreaks from 2014 through 2020 on GenBank, and found several mutations at the primer and probe binding sites of the existing EV-D68-specific PCR assays. Subsequently, we designed two novel assays corresponding to the recently reported EV-D68 sequences: an EV-D68-specific real-time and seminested PCR. In an analysis of 22 EV-D68 confirmed cases during a recent EV-D68 outbreak in Japan, the new real-time PCR had higher sensitivity than the existing assay (100% versus 45%, 0.01) and a lower median value (27.8 versus 32.8, 0.005). Sensitivity was higher for the new nonnested PCR (91%) than for the existing seminested PCR assay (50%, 0.01). The specificity of the new real-time PCR was 100% using samples from non-EV-D68-infected cases (  = 135). In conclusion, our novel assays had higher sensitivity than the existing assay and might lead to more accurate diagnosis of recently circulating EV-D68. To prepare for future EV-D68 outbreaks, EV-D68-specific assays must be continuously monitored and updated.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
DOI:10.1128/jcm.01151-21