Impact of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty: a randomised, observer‐masked, controlled trial

Summary The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional anaesthesia technique that aims to provide hip analgesia with preservation of motor function, although evidence is currently lacking. In this single‐centre, observer‐masked, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing total h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2021-11, Vol.76 (11), p.1492-1498
Hauptverfasser: Pascarella, G., Costa, F., Del Buono, R., Pulitanò, R., Strumia, A., Piliego, C., De Quattro, E., Cataldo, R., Agrò, F. E., Carassiti, M., Gargano, F., Longo, F., Velluti, D., Schiavoni, L., Mattei, A., Nonnis, G., Remore, L. M., Rizzo, S., Paglione, L., Scaduto, V., Coletta, T., Di Giorgio, E., De Rosa, F., La Verde, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a novel regional anaesthesia technique that aims to provide hip analgesia with preservation of motor function, although evidence is currently lacking. In this single‐centre, observer‐masked, randomised controlled trial, patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty received pericapsular nerve group block or no block (control group). Primary outcome measure was maximum pain scores (0–10 numeric rating scale) measured in the first 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption; patient mobilisation assessments; and length of hospital stay. Sixty patients were randomly allocated equally between groups. The maximum pain score of patients receiving the pericapsular nerve group block was significantly lower than in the control group at all time‐points, with a median (IQR [range]) of 2.5 (2.0–3.7 [0–7]) vs. 5.5 (5.0–7.0 [2–8]) at 12 h; 3 (2.0–4.0 [0–7]) vs. 6 (5.0–6.0 [2–8]) at 24 h; and 2.0 (2.0–4.0 [0–5]) vs. 3.0 (2.0–4.7 [0–6]) at 48 h; all p 
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/anae.15536