Corrosion Performance of Nano-TiO2-Modified Concrete under a Dry-Wet Sulfate Environment

This study compared the effects of the sulfate dry-wet cycle on the properties of ordinary concrete and nano-TiO2-modified concrete, including the mass loss rate, ultrasonic wave velocity, compressive strength, and XRD characteristics. In addition, a series of compression simulations carried out usi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials 2021-10, Vol.14 (19), p.5900, Article 5900
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Chao, Liao, Hao-Hao, Chen, You-Liang, Du, Xi, Peng, Bin, Fernandez-Steeger, Tomas Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compared the effects of the sulfate dry-wet cycle on the properties of ordinary concrete and nano-TiO2-modified concrete, including the mass loss rate, ultrasonic wave velocity, compressive strength, and XRD characteristics. In addition, a series of compression simulations carried out using the PFC2D software are also presented for comparison. The results show the following: (1) with an increase in dry-wet cycles, the damage to the concrete gradually increased, and adding nano-TiO2 into ordinary concrete can improve the material's sulfate resistance; (2) after 50 sulfate dry-wet cycles, the mass loss rate of ordinary concrete was -3.744%, while that of nano-TiO2-modified concrete was -1.363%; (3) the compressive strength of ordinary concrete was reduced from 41.53 to 25.12 MPa (a reduction of 39.51%), but the compressive strength of nano-TiO2-modified concrete was reduced from 49.91 to 32.12 MPa (a reduction of 35.64%); (4) after a sulfate dry-wet cycle, the nano-TiO2-modified concrete surface produced white crystalline products, considered to be ettringite based on the XRD analysis; (5) when considering the peak stress and strain of the concrete samples, the numerical results agreed well with the test results, indicating the reliability of the method.
ISSN:1996-1944
1996-1944
DOI:10.3390/ma14195900