Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials

To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μ-SBS) between resin-based cements and core build-up materials after water storage. Cylinders (1x1 mm) of conventional dual-cure resin cement (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE), universal dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) or self-adhesive resin cement (Rely...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry 2021-10, Vol.13 (10), p.e1030-e1037
Hauptverfasser: Lacerda, Fernanda C, Vieira-Junior, Waldemir F, de Lacerda, Paulo E, Turssi, Cecília P, Basting, Roberta T, do Amaral, Flávia L, França, Fabiana Mg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μ-SBS) between resin-based cements and core build-up materials after water storage. Cylinders (1x1 mm) of conventional dual-cure resin cement (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE), universal dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) or self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) were adhered to disks (6x2 mm) made with commercial core build-up materials (Bis-Core, Bisco or LuxaCore Z, DMG) or conventional nanocomposite resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE). The specimens (n=10) were submitted to μ-SBS test using a universal testing machine and fracture pattern analysis at 48 hours or after 9 months of water storage. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey's test (α=0.05). After 48 hours, regardless of the resin-based cement used, the μ-SBS to the conventional resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) was greater compared to other materials. However, after 9 months, there was a statistically significant decrease in μ-SBS values between the conventional resin composite and evaluated luting agents. The μ-SBS values of core build-up commercial materials (Bis-Core and LuxaCore Z) did not change over time. Regardless of the composite used and storage time, there was no statistically significant difference between the resin-based cements. After 48 h, the most prevalent failure was mixed for all groups. However, after 9 months, the core build-up materials showed a predominantly mixed fracture pattern whereas the resin composite presented an adhesive pattern. Commercial core build-up materials achieved stable bonding performance with resin-based cements over time. Composite resins, resin cement, dental restoration failure.
ISSN:1989-5488
1989-5488
DOI:10.4317/jced.58515