Functional Genomics Identify Distinct and Overlapping Genes Mediating Resistance to Different Classes of Heterobifunctional Degraders of Oncoproteins

Heterobifunctional proteolysis-targeting chimeric compounds leverage the activity of E3 ligases to induce degradation of target oncoproteins and exhibit potent preclinical antitumor activity. To dissect the mechanisms regulating tumor cell sensitivity to different classes of pharmacological “degraders” of oncoproteins, we performed genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing studies. We observed that myeloma cell resistance to degraders of different targets (BET bromodomain proteins, CDK9) and operating through CRBN (degronimids) or VHL is primarily mediated by prevention of, rather than adaptation to, breakdown of the target oncoprotein; and this involves loss of function of the cognate E3 ligase or interactors/regulators of the respective cullin-RING ligase (CRL) complex. The substantial gene-level differences for resistance mechanisms to CRBN- versus VHL-based degraders explains mechanistically the lack of cross-resistance with sequential administration of these two degrader classes. Development of degraders leveraging more diverse E3 ligases/CRLs may facilitate sequential/alternating versus combined uses of these agents toward potentially delaying or preventing resistance. [Display omitted] •PROTAC resistance via disruption of rather than adaptation to oncoprotein degradation•PROTACs using different E3s/CRLs: resistance via similar pathways but different genes•Result of using two PROTACs depends on E3, target, and sequential versus concurrent use•E3s essential for and highly expressed in tumor cells are useful for future PROTACs Genome-scale CRISPR gene editing studies by Shirasaki et al. reveal which genes confer myeloma cell resistance to PROTACs that leverage different E3 ligases to degrade various oncoproteins. The study provides a framework for sequential/alternating versus combined use of PROTACs, depending on which E3 ligase and oncoprotein they engage.