Strain comparisons in inhibitory discrimination learning and novel object recognition procedures

•Behavioural comparisons of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats.•Within-subjects inhibitory learning (A +/AX-) and novel object recognition variants.•Wistars showed clearer inhibitory discrimination than Lister Hooded rats.•Novel object recognition discriminations showed strain difference...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiology & behavior 2021-10, Vol.240, p.113557-113557, Article 113557
Hauptverfasser: Waite, L., Bonardi, C., Stevenson, C.W., Cassaday, H.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Behavioural comparisons of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats.•Within-subjects inhibitory learning (A +/AX-) and novel object recognition variants.•Wistars showed clearer inhibitory discrimination than Lister Hooded rats.•Novel object recognition discriminations showed strain differences in consistency.•Wistars are good for associative learning and basic object recognition procedures. Strain differences in visual abilities and exploratory tendencies can confound rats’ performance in cognitive tests of learning and memory. In the present study we compared the performance of albino Wistar and pigmented Lister Hooded rats in appetitive conditioning and recognition memory procedures, specifically within-subjects inhibitory learning (A+ /AX-) and novel object recognition (NOR) variants. The inhibition task included an excitatory training stage and summation and retardation tests. Difference scores were used to help control for individual variation in baseline nosepoke responding. NOR was tested after a 10 min delay, following 24hr delay and using a recency variant. Discrimination ratios were used to control for individual variation in exploratory activity. In the inhibitory learning procedure, Lister Hooded showed more magazine activity prior to stimulus presentations than Wistar rats but this was a transient effect restricted to day 1 of excitatory training. There was no strain difference in associative learning at the excitatory training stage. The Wistars went on to show some performance advantage at the inhibitory discrimination stage and marginally stronger retardation test performance. In the NOR tasks, there was no significant effect of strain on cognitive performance, but the Wistars showed some advantage in the 10 min delay variant, whereas in the 24hr delay and relative recency NOR variants, the Lister Hooded rats showed some advantage. Overall the results of the present study confirm the suitability of Wistar rats for use in associative learning and basic NOR procedures.
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113557