Brain MRI Deep Learning and Bayesian Inference System Augments Radiology Resident Performance

Automated quantitative and probabilistic medical image analysis has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the radiology workflow. We sought to determine whether AI systems for brain MRI diagnosis could be used as a clinical decision support tool to augment radiologist performance....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of digital imaging 2021-08, Vol.34 (4), p.1049-1058
Hauptverfasser: Rudie, Jeffrey D., Duda, Jeffrey, Duong, Michael Tran, Chen, Po-Hao, Xie, Long, Kurtz, Robert, Ware, Jeffrey B., Choi, Joshua, Mattay, Raghav R., Botzolakis, Emmanuel J., Gee, James C., Bryan, R. Nick, Cook, Tessa S., Mohan, Suyash, Nasrallah, Ilya M., Rauschecker, Andreas M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Automated quantitative and probabilistic medical image analysis has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the radiology workflow. We sought to determine whether AI systems for brain MRI diagnosis could be used as a clinical decision support tool to augment radiologist performance. We utilized previously developed AI systems that combine convolutional neural networks and expert-derived Bayesian networks to distinguish among 50 diagnostic entities on multimodal brain MRIs. We tested whether these systems could augment radiologist performance through an interactive clinical decision support tool known as Adaptive Radiology Interpretation and Education System (ARIES) in 194 test cases. Four radiology residents and three academic neuroradiologists viewed half of the cases unassisted and half with the results of the AI system displayed on ARIES. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologists for top diagnosis (TDx) and top three differential diagnosis (T3DDx) was compared with and without ARIES. Radiology resident performance was significantly better with ARIES for both TDx (55% vs 30%; P  
ISSN:0897-1889
1618-727X
1618-727X
DOI:10.1007/s10278-021-00470-1