An Evaluation of the Online Quality of Content of United States Accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Training Programs

Pain medicine fellowship applicants often seek information about programs from the Internet, which is becoming even more relevant with the transition to virtual interviews as a consequence of the global pandemic. Previous literature has revealed the significance of training program websites as part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology and pain medicine 2021-06, Vol.11 (3), p.e115981-e115981
Hauptverfasser: Mukhdomi, Taif, Woolley, Parker, Mukhdomi, Junaid, Beck, Brandon, Patel, Deeran, Harris, Marcus, Yadav, Abhishek, Kendall, Mark C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Pain medicine fellowship applicants often seek information about programs from the Internet, which is becoming even more relevant with the transition to virtual interviews as a consequence of the global pandemic. Previous literature has revealed the significance of training program websites as part of the application process in other specialties. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the content, design, organization, and user friendliness by using a composite score to determine the quality of the pain medicine fellowship websites (PMFW). Accredited pain medicine fellowship programs was queried from three databases for pain medicine education: (1) Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS); (2) the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA); and (3) the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Programs that appeared within one and/or more databases were eligible for study inclusion. PMFW were evaluated for the accessibility of recruitment and education content items. The quality of PMFW was determined as multifactorial composed of four dimensions: content, design, organization, and user friendliness. For program recruitment, PMFW contained an average of 12 ± 4.0 of 32 content items (38%) for fellowship programs: (1) 83% of fellowship programs specified the number of positions available for the 2021 Match; (2) 17% indicated alumni career placement; (3) 6.8% supplied interview dates; and (4) merely 4.9% detailed the selection process. For program education, PMFW contained an average of 7 ± 3.4 of 16 content items (44%): (1) 70% of programs provided a rotation schedule; (2) 49% detailed operative experiences; and (3) just 16% included simulation training. Regarding the quality based on content, design, organization, and user friendliness, the average PMFW was not "good" with only 1% of PMFW meeting "great" standards. A kappa value of 0.92 was calculated for inter-rater reliability. The web presence of pain medicine fellowship programs falls short of providing essential accessibility, content, design, organization, and user friendliness to allow applicants to adequately access information about program characteristics. There are ample opportunities to increase the effectiveness of PMFW to benefit training programs and to inform prospective applicants, especially given the rise of virtual applications and interviews.
ISSN:2228-7523
2228-7531
DOI:10.5812/aapm.115981