A Hospital-Based Randomized Controlled Trial—Comparing the Outcome of Normal Delivery Between Squatting and Lying Down Positions During Labour

Background Labour is a physiological process. Before the seventeenth century, the upright birthing position was common in western countries. The supine position became popular because of the convenience for health professionals rather than the benefits for women. Aims and Objectives To compare the o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India 2021-08, Vol.71 (4), p.393-398
Hauptverfasser: Shedmake, Priyanka Vijay, Wakode, S. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Labour is a physiological process. Before the seventeenth century, the upright birthing position was common in western countries. The supine position became popular because of the convenience for health professionals rather than the benefits for women. Aims and Objectives To compare the outcomes of normal deliveries between squatting and lying down positions and to assess the risks and benefits of squatting position during the second and third stages of labour and its comparison with the lying down position. Methodology A hospital-based prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in tertiary care centre carried over a period of 18 months among 212 female patients in labour assigned in Group A squatting position and Group B lying down position. Results The mean age of patients in Group A was 23.30 ± 4.30 years and Group B was 23.81 ± 4.13 years. The mean duration of second and third stages of labour in both multigravida and primigravida patients was significantly lower in Group A ( p  
ISSN:0971-9202
0975-6434
DOI:10.1007/s13224-021-01439-4