Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study
Few studies have assessed active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with implants. Improved knowledge about functional tactile sensibility will contribute to several clinical applications, such as protocols for immediate loading, prosthesis design, occlusal improvement in implantology, an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Materials 2021-08, Vol.14 (16), p.4644 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 16 |
| container_start_page | 4644 |
| container_title | Materials |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Moraes, Nathalia Moraes, Eduardo Anastacio, Tiago Silva, Licínio Machado, Aldir Schoichet, José Alto, Raphael Monte Mello-Machado, Rafael Cardarelli, Angelo Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Casado, Priscila Romanos, Georgios |
| description | Few studies have assessed active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with implants. Improved knowledge about functional tactile sensibility will contribute to several clinical applications, such as protocols for immediate loading, prosthesis design, occlusal improvement in implantology, and physiological integration of implant-supported prostheses. The present study evaluated active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with Brånemark-type mandibular prostheses that impede the total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. Thirty-five subjects participated in this study. The experimental group (n = 18) inclusion criteria were as follows: Brånemark-type prosthesis and a total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. The control group (n = 17) was composed of participants with complete healthy dentition. Carbon foils with different thicknesses (12 μm, 24 μm, 40 μm, 80 μm, and 200 μm) were placed in the premolar region to evaluate the brink of active oral tactile sensibility. The researchers assessed the participants 120 times. After evaluation, we observed a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the groups. Additionally, the degree of sensibility was found for all thicknesses, except for 12 μm, on both sides. There was a more significant increase in perception in the control group as the carbon thickness increased. The tactile sensibility threshold was 2.5 times greater for participants with prostheses. Thus, the tactile sensibility for mandibular implant-supported and maxillary mucosa-supported prostheses is significantly lower than that of dentate patients, which was detected above the thickness of 80 μm; in patients with natural dentition, different thicknesses were seen starting from 24 μm. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma14164644 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8398523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2566030311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3cb348b702359ca39b7d023869191b270b5082ba2eb1d95f16803108e00c57443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1KBDEQhYMoKjobT9DgRoTWpCvdnbgQxsY_GFCYcSkhSWc0mulop1uYnXfwDJ7Em3gSMyj-ZVMP6uPlVRVCWwTvAXC8P5OEkoIWlC6hdcJ5kRJO6fIvvYYGIdzh-AAIy_gqWgNKKZAiX0fXQ93ZJ5NMZKzOJGPTBKuss9088dPkqH17bcxMtvfJZes7r71biNDdmmDCQTJMKhnM-_NL5Zuujc3K2cZq6ZJx19fzTbQylS6YwVfdQFcnx5PqLB1dnJ5Xw1GqgUGXglZAmSpxBjnXErgq66hZwQknKiuxyjHLlMyMIjXPp6RgGAhmBmOdl3GUDXT46fvQq5mptYlhpBMPrY3R58JLK_52GnsrbvyTYMBZnkE02PkyaP1jb0InZjZo45xsjO-DyPKiwBA_JRHd_ofe-b5t4ngLKocypsaR2v2kdNxWaM30OwzBYnE48XM4-ABggYmy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565376910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Moraes, Nathalia ; Moraes, Eduardo ; Anastacio, Tiago ; Silva, Licínio ; Machado, Aldir ; Schoichet, José ; Alto, Raphael Monte ; Mello-Machado, Rafael ; Cardarelli, Angelo ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros ; Casado, Priscila ; Romanos, Georgios</creator><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Nathalia ; Moraes, Eduardo ; Anastacio, Tiago ; Silva, Licínio ; Machado, Aldir ; Schoichet, José ; Alto, Raphael Monte ; Mello-Machado, Rafael ; Cardarelli, Angelo ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros ; Casado, Priscila ; Romanos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies have assessed active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with implants. Improved knowledge about functional tactile sensibility will contribute to several clinical applications, such as protocols for immediate loading, prosthesis design, occlusal improvement in implantology, and physiological integration of implant-supported prostheses. The present study evaluated active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with Brånemark-type mandibular prostheses that impede the total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. Thirty-five subjects participated in this study. The experimental group (n = 18) inclusion criteria were as follows: Brånemark-type prosthesis and a total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. The control group (n = 17) was composed of participants with complete healthy dentition. Carbon foils with different thicknesses (12 μm, 24 μm, 40 μm, 80 μm, and 200 μm) were placed in the premolar region to evaluate the brink of active oral tactile sensibility. The researchers assessed the participants 120 times. After evaluation, we observed a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the groups. Additionally, the degree of sensibility was found for all thicknesses, except for 12 μm, on both sides. There was a more significant increase in perception in the control group as the carbon thickness increased. The tactile sensibility threshold was 2.5 times greater for participants with prostheses. Thus, the tactile sensibility for mandibular implant-supported and maxillary mucosa-supported prostheses is significantly lower than that of dentate patients, which was detected above the thickness of 80 μm; in patients with natural dentition, different thicknesses were seen starting from 24 μm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma14164644</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34443165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Carbon ; Dental implants ; Dentistry ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Foils ; Ligaments ; Physiology ; Prostheses ; Teeth ; Thickness ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2021-08, Vol.14 (16), p.4644</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3cb348b702359ca39b7d023869191b270b5082ba2eb1d95f16803108e00c57443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3cb348b702359ca39b7d023869191b270b5082ba2eb1d95f16803108e00c57443</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7745-5957 ; 0000-0002-0201-3273 ; 0000-0001-5775-0222 ; 0000-0002-3609-7604</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398523/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8398523/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Nathalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastacio, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Licínio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Aldir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoichet, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alto, Raphael Monte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello-Machado, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardarelli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><title>Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study</title><title>Materials</title><description>Few studies have assessed active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with implants. Improved knowledge about functional tactile sensibility will contribute to several clinical applications, such as protocols for immediate loading, prosthesis design, occlusal improvement in implantology, and physiological integration of implant-supported prostheses. The present study evaluated active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with Brånemark-type mandibular prostheses that impede the total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. Thirty-five subjects participated in this study. The experimental group (n = 18) inclusion criteria were as follows: Brånemark-type prosthesis and a total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. The control group (n = 17) was composed of participants with complete healthy dentition. Carbon foils with different thicknesses (12 μm, 24 μm, 40 μm, 80 μm, and 200 μm) were placed in the premolar region to evaluate the brink of active oral tactile sensibility. The researchers assessed the participants 120 times. After evaluation, we observed a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the groups. Additionally, the degree of sensibility was found for all thicknesses, except for 12 μm, on both sides. There was a more significant increase in perception in the control group as the carbon thickness increased. The tactile sensibility threshold was 2.5 times greater for participants with prostheses. Thus, the tactile sensibility for mandibular implant-supported and maxillary mucosa-supported prostheses is significantly lower than that of dentate patients, which was detected above the thickness of 80 μm; in patients with natural dentition, different thicknesses were seen starting from 24 μm.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foils</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1KBDEQhYMoKjobT9DgRoTWpCvdnbgQxsY_GFCYcSkhSWc0mulop1uYnXfwDJ7Em3gSMyj-ZVMP6uPlVRVCWwTvAXC8P5OEkoIWlC6hdcJ5kRJO6fIvvYYGIdzh-AAIy_gqWgNKKZAiX0fXQ93ZJ5NMZKzOJGPTBKuss9088dPkqH17bcxMtvfJZes7r71biNDdmmDCQTJMKhnM-_NL5Zuujc3K2cZq6ZJx19fzTbQylS6YwVfdQFcnx5PqLB1dnJ5Xw1GqgUGXglZAmSpxBjnXErgq66hZwQknKiuxyjHLlMyMIjXPp6RgGAhmBmOdl3GUDXT46fvQq5mptYlhpBMPrY3R58JLK_52GnsrbvyTYMBZnkE02PkyaP1jb0InZjZo45xsjO-DyPKiwBA_JRHd_ofe-b5t4ngLKocypsaR2v2kdNxWaM30OwzBYnE48XM4-ABggYmy</recordid><startdate>20210818</startdate><enddate>20210818</enddate><creator>Moraes, Nathalia</creator><creator>Moraes, Eduardo</creator><creator>Anastacio, Tiago</creator><creator>Silva, Licínio</creator><creator>Machado, Aldir</creator><creator>Schoichet, José</creator><creator>Alto, Raphael Monte</creator><creator>Mello-Machado, Rafael</creator><creator>Cardarelli, Angelo</creator><creator>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros</creator><creator>Casado, Priscila</creator><creator>Romanos, Georgios</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-3273</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-0222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-7604</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210818</creationdate><title>Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study</title><author>Moraes, Nathalia ; Moraes, Eduardo ; Anastacio, Tiago ; Silva, Licínio ; Machado, Aldir ; Schoichet, José ; Alto, Raphael Monte ; Mello-Machado, Rafael ; Cardarelli, Angelo ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros ; Casado, Priscila ; Romanos, Georgios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-3cb348b702359ca39b7d023869191b270b5082ba2eb1d95f16803108e00c57443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foils</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Nathalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastacio, Tiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Licínio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Aldir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoichet, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alto, Raphael Monte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mello-Machado, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardarelli, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casado, Priscila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanos, Georgios</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moraes, Nathalia</au><au>Moraes, Eduardo</au><au>Anastacio, Tiago</au><au>Silva, Licínio</au><au>Machado, Aldir</au><au>Schoichet, José</au><au>Alto, Raphael Monte</au><au>Mello-Machado, Rafael</au><au>Cardarelli, Angelo</au><au>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros</au><au>Casado, Priscila</au><au>Romanos, Georgios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><date>2021-08-18</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4644</spage><pages>4644-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>Few studies have assessed active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with implants. Improved knowledge about functional tactile sensibility will contribute to several clinical applications, such as protocols for immediate loading, prosthesis design, occlusal improvement in implantology, and physiological integration of implant-supported prostheses. The present study evaluated active tactile sensibility in patients rehabilitated with Brånemark-type mandibular prostheses that impede the total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. Thirty-five subjects participated in this study. The experimental group (n = 18) inclusion criteria were as follows: Brånemark-type prosthesis and a total mucosa-supported maxillary prosthesis. The control group (n = 17) was composed of participants with complete healthy dentition. Carbon foils with different thicknesses (12 μm, 24 μm, 40 μm, 80 μm, and 200 μm) were placed in the premolar region to evaluate the brink of active oral tactile sensibility. The researchers assessed the participants 120 times. After evaluation, we observed a statistical difference (p < 0.05) between the groups. Additionally, the degree of sensibility was found for all thicknesses, except for 12 μm, on both sides. There was a more significant increase in perception in the control group as the carbon thickness increased. The tactile sensibility threshold was 2.5 times greater for participants with prostheses. Thus, the tactile sensibility for mandibular implant-supported and maxillary mucosa-supported prostheses is significantly lower than that of dentate patients, which was detected above the thickness of 80 μm; in patients with natural dentition, different thicknesses were seen starting from 24 μm.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34443165</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma14164644</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-3273</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-0222</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-7604</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
| ispartof | Materials, 2021-08, Vol.14 (16), p.4644 |
| issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8398523 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PMC (PubMed Central); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Biomechanics Carbon Dental implants Dentistry Evaluation Experiments Foils Ligaments Physiology Prostheses Teeth Thickness Transplants & implants |
| title | Active Tactile Sensibility of Brånemark Protocol Prostheses: A Case–Control Clinical Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A27%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Active%20Tactile%20Sensibility%20of%20Br%C3%A5nemark%20Protocol%20Prostheses:%20A%20Case%E2%80%93Control%20Clinical%20Study&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Moraes,%20Nathalia&rft.date=2021-08-18&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4644&rft.pages=4644-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma14164644&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2566030311%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565376910&rft_id=info:pmid/34443165&rfr_iscdi=true |