Glargine versus regular insulin protocol in feline diabetic ketoacidosis

Objectives To determine whether basal‐bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting University teaching hospital. Animals Twenty cats diagn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2000) Tex. : 2000), 2021-07, Vol.31 (4), p.459-468
Hauptverfasser: Zeugswetter, Florian K., Luckschander‐Zeller, Nicole, Karlovits, Sonja, Rand, Jaquie S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To determine whether basal‐bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol. Design Prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting University teaching hospital. Animals Twenty cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Interventions The cats were block‐randomized to either a CRI protocol using regular insulin (CRI‐group; n = 10) or a basal‐bolus SC and IM glargine protocol (glargine‐group, n = 10). Baseline blood gases, electrolytes, glucose, and β‐hydroxybutyrate (β‐OHB) concentrations were measured at the time of admission and later at predefined intervals until reaching the primary endpoint of the study, defined as a β‐hydroxybutyrate concentration 
ISSN:1479-3261
1476-4431
DOI:10.1111/vec.13062