Nationwide treatment and outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a rare tumour that requires complex multidisciplinary management. All known data are almost exclusively derived from expert centres. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes of patients with pCCA in a nationwide cohort. Methods Data on all patients d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Liver international 2021-08, Vol.41 (8), p.1945-1953
Hauptverfasser: Keulen, Anne‐Marleen, Franssen, Stijn, Geest, Lydia G., Boer, Marieke T., Coenraad, Minneke, Driel, Lydi M. J. W., Erdmann, Joris I., Haj Mohammad, Nadia, Heij, Lara, Klümpen, Heinz‐Josef, Tjwa, Eric, Valkenburg‐van Iersel, Liselot, Verheij, Joanne, Groot Koerkamp, Bas, Olthof, Pim B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a rare tumour that requires complex multidisciplinary management. All known data are almost exclusively derived from expert centres. This study aimed to analyse the outcomes of patients with pCCA in a nationwide cohort. Methods Data on all patients diagnosed with pCCA in the Netherlands between 2010 and 2018 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data included type of hospital of diagnosis and the received treatment. Outcomes included the type of treatment and overall survival. Results A total of 2031 patients were included and the median overall survival for the overall cohort was 5.2 (95% CI 4.7‐5.7) months. Three‐hundred‐ten (15%) patients underwent surgical resection, 271 (13%) underwent palliative systemic treatment, 21 (1%) palliative local anti‐cancer treatment and 1429 (70%) underwent best supportive care. These treatments resulted in a median overall survival of 29.6 (95% CI 25.2‐34.0), 12.2 (95% CI 11.0‐13.3), 14.5 (95%CI 8.2‐20.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6‐3.2) months respectively. Resection rate was 13% in patients who were diagnosed in non‐academic and 32% in academic centres (P 
ISSN:1478-3223
1478-3231
DOI:10.1111/liv.14856